Friday, July 25, 2008

Applause


Greetings friends and neighbors. We have lived through another week – almost – and it’s high time to get Letter #58 on its way.

Accord on Applause

I suppose “clapping” is as old as the first human. He probably looked down at his hands and asked, “Wonder what these are for?”

Then he smacked his two hanny-paws together and this made a noise. People have been “clapping” ever since. Girls add a lot of bouncing and jumping and backwards kicking when they clap.

As for me, I just don’t do it. At all. Ever. No need. Nothing impresses me enough to make a fool of myself by smacking my front fins together, like some stupid trained seal in a circus. It’s undignified. Unnecessary. It lacks decorum. It’s embarrassing, either to clap or to be seen clapping.

Clapping is sometimes called “ovation.” As in, “They gave him an ovation.” In ancient Rome, clapping was a lesser ceremonial tribute to a hero whose deeds were not great enough to justify a full triumph. So if you’re only No. 2, you get clapping, not a plaque or trophy.

Clapping is especially annoying when it happens during or even at the end of Holy Mass. Mass is not the time for applause. Church is not the place for applause. “Clapping songs” are totally inappropriate during Mass.

If you are inalterably driven to applaud, clap in the basketball arena, if you must. Or during the curtain call after a play down at the civic theater. Squelch your drive while in church.

-0-

One time in Santa Cruz, I tipped my big fat Harley dresser over in a cloud of dust, right in front of a crowd of Hells Angels.

The Angels turned around and looked when they heard the noise – then they broke into applause. And cheers. And laughter. I would have, too, but I was too busy digging myself out from under the bike. That’s the only time in my life that I can recall feeling that applause would be appropriate.

That’s why it was especially notable to me when Laura ran across the following quote earlier this week. See if you can guess who wrote this:

“Whenever applause breaks out in the liturgy because of some human achievement, it is a sure sign that the essence of the liturgy has totally disappeared and been replaced by a kind of religious entertainment.”

We found this glorious quote on another “blog,” this one offered by a Deacon in New York. It is attributed to Cardinal Ratzinger, now known as Pope Benedict XVI.

The Deacon writes: “The key question is this: is clapping a reverent action, or does clapping break the liturgical spirit of reverence which Rome is calling us to protect?”

You can find this quote and a lot of good stuff at:
http://www.deacbench.blogspot.com/

Mack the Knife

It escapes me. Perhaps someone can offer enlightenment.

Both Bobby Darin and Louis Armstrong had huge hits on the song.

But what is the allure of a song which makes a hero of a man who stabs people to death? Really. What is the allure? Write me if you know.

Funny ideas

Yes I was complacent. I was zooming through the halls of the Northern Colorado Medical Center, visiting hospitalized Catholics.

My job, which I volunteer to perform, is to bring the Eucharist to the sick. I am trained, authorized and confident to do this. I am experienced. I am careful, very careful, to perform my job in the most reverent way I know how to do.

My parish priest knows I am doing this job. He appreciates my service, and similar service by dozens of others like me, because it takes a little bit of the pressure off him. I have the priest’s encouragement and approval.

One thing that makes this service so gratifying is that almost 100 percent of the persons I meet are gracious and welcome me into their company. They are hospitalized because they are ill; nevertheless, they want to pray and to receive communion.

Rarely will I come away from a room feeling worse than I did coming in. I’ve never been yelled at or threatened.

About the worst thing that ever happens is a terse response from the ill person, maybe something like, “No, no, not today.”

This can mean anything from “My tummy is upset and I wish you would go away,” to “I haven’t been to confession in 23 years, so I’d better not take communion.”

So I was knocked back on my heels when I experienced the following response from one man at NCMC a few days ago.

The man asked, “Are you a priest?”

No, I answered, I am not a priest. I am an Extraordinary Minister of Communion. “I only take communion from a priest,” said the patient, gruffly.

That’s fine, I said. Then I forced us to say a few prayers to get through my vexation, making sure I left him with something – and that I departed having accomplished something.

I could have provided a smart-ass answer; I could have said, “It was a priest who consecrated the host. The priest is still the Ordinary. I am an ‘Extra-ordinary.’ I am only carrying the Sacrament to you because the priest is simply too busy to visit everyone in person.”

But I was restrained. I felt like saying “Jesus is right here in this pyx and how dare you refuse Him?” (A pyx is a small golden container specifically intended to carry the Sacrament to the sick.)

The assignment of Extraordinary Ministers to jail, hospital and home communion visits is genuine, legitimate. The Church knows and approves. It is a relatively new practice in the 2,008-year-old Church – this has been happening for only about 50 years. So naturally some people get it in their heads that there must be something wrong with it.

What a dumb idea. “I’m only going to receive communion from a priest.” In some parishes, it might be weeks before a person could be in the right line at the right time to receive directly from a priest.

How often are we to receive communion? The Church says this should be a minimum of once annually. There is a strong suggestion that this should be done weekly. Daily is even better.

Since I met with that one difficult man, I’ve been ruminating on this issue. It seems to me that if we believe the Sacrament IS the body of Christ, then Jesus is present in it. The Real Presence of Christ is in the Eucharist. If you don’t believe that, you’re lying when you claim to be a Catholic.

It seems to me it would be foolish to turn down the Sacrament. There really isn’t all that much to be gained by denying Christ.

Oh well. Some people get some funny ideas.

The ACLU

That acronym stands for “American Civil Liberties Union.” Once upon a time, it was an organization which would aid the lowly, the picked-on, the downtrodden, the undefended or indefensible.

Now the ACLU spends most of its time trying to keep God out of places. In fact, the ACLU spends so much time fighting God that the defense of civil liberties goes begging. What’s with that?

Word of the Week: Protestant. A protestant is a person who follows the teachings of Martin Luther, John Calvin or King Henry the Eighth.

The word was used originally to denote any of the German princes and free cities that formally protested to the Diet of Spires its decision to uphold the edict of the Diet of Worms against the Reformation.

The usual meaning these days is, “Any Christian not belonging to the Roman Catholic Church or the Orthodox Eastern Church.” In the 17th century the term was restricted to Lutherans and Anglicans.

It means “A person who protests.”

Next week’s word: Xeriscape.

-0-

Gripes? Complaints? Whines? or Comments? Adoration? Puppy love? Reciprocal rant? Feel free to express yourself in the comments!

1 comment:

  1. Funny how people can be convicted by the Holy Spirit to a certain belief yet believe two totally different ways. I don't know how that works and probably never will.

    I am totally convicted of the opposite of your feelings about "reverence' during Mass. I always come back to Jesus and His word when I am in doubt and so far it has never failed and I believe never will fail.

    The disagreement isn't so much about clapping, I can take it or leave it but it is what clapping represents, an expression of feelings especially when singing or listening to music, like swaying to the beat of a song, tapping your foot. It is a way of expressing joy, happiness, approval of what you are hearing, adding to the feel of a song.

    Using the definition you had in your letter, an 'ovation' to God. Some people are more outwardly expressive than others. God made everyone different. Some songs don't lend themselves to any outward expression (except maybe heart-felt tears) but bring one to a deep, quiet, reverence which is also driven by the Holy Spirit.

    Music has a way of motivating, and expressing feelings. I think many times of the words in Rev. 3:15-16..."I know your works; I know that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either cold or hot. So, because you are lukewarm, neither hot or cold, I will spit you out of my mouth."

    Now I am certainly not saying that just because a person chooses not to clap doesn't mean he is 'cold' or 'lukewarm' for God. Just the same as no one, know matter what position he holds in the church, can claim his form of reverence is the only way to be reverent.

    Sounds just like the Pharisees to me. They spent so much time trying to be reverent in their own eyes and making everyone else be reverent the way they viewed was right, they missed the whole point, which of course was Jesus.

    Then of course there was King David, a very holy (yet sinful) man. (1 Chronicles 15: 1-29) He was so excited at bringing the ark of the Lord back to Jerusalem he wanted to make a loud sound of rejoicing (can you imagine) and appointed chanters to sing and play musical instruments of harps, lyres, trumpets and cymbals (oh my goodness - that's worse than clapping) "to make a loud sound of rejoicing".

    He then hit the streets singing, dancing and leaping. Good thing Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict) wasn't there. But David's wife was, and she took care of it. She 'despised him in her heart'. (I wonder if they squelched clapping at World Youth Day?)

    Entertainment.......ah yes. That's the Catholic politically correct word of the century and our cure-all answer to the high numbers leaving the church. We don't entertain. So King David was entertaining everyone. He wasn't really expressing his faith and excitement in God and in the ark. He wasn't giving God his very best. He wasn't using the talents God gave all those musicians to give glory back to God, and he certainly wasn't motivating the others to glorify God. He was not acting reverently.

    He really should have 'squelched it'. Guess his wife was the only reverent one who really 'got it'. Don't think you are making a fool of yourself by clapping. Take a look at Psalm 47:2...All you peoples, clap your hands; shout to God with joyful cries. (but not during Mass please)

    Psalm 100:2..Shout joyfully to the Lord, all you lands; worship the Lord with cries of gladness; come before Him with joyful song.(but not too joyful - reverence please).

    Isaiah 55:12 .... Mountains and hills shall break out in song before you, and all the trees of the countryside shall clap their hands. (trees don't even have hands and they have permission to clap)

    I don't think these verses refer to the 'clappers' as fools! In Matthew 12, the Pharisees were once again trying to trick Jesus because His disciples picked some grain in the field as they were passing through on the Sabbath which of course was against their pharisaic rules.

    Jesus' response, "I say to you, something greater than the temple is here...." Isn't that what we as Catholics believe? We have something greater than any other church, the real presence of Jesus?

    Yet we are asked to squelch our praise and worship?! What is happening to our Catholic church? We are attempting to keep the new wine of the Eucharist into the old wineskin for tradition’s sake, just like the Pharisees. Jesus never said to 'squelch it'. That was never His intent. It doesn't work.

    Millions of Catholics are leaving the church where they are finding new wine in a new wine skin, where their faith and relationship with Jesus is deepening and yes, even without the Eucharist. Our answer ...... they're being entertained. The Ark was the Eucharist of the Old Testament and it was taken away because the people’s hearts were far from God. They relied on the power of the ark (which was God’s presence and power) for their salvation and had no relationship with God. Don't we learn from the past? As our beloved Cardinal Kaspar said, "It's time Catholics take the plank out of their own eyes before taking the splinter out of the (evangelicals) eyes." I wonder if he claps?

    The Sabbath was made for us, we weren't made for the Sabbath. Not everyone is the same. There really is something funny about your "funny ideas" section. That hospitalized man that didn't want to receive the Eucharist from anyone but a priest...it's not because he doesn't believe in the Eucharist. He simply is holding on to his traditional Catholic beliefs!!!! Bet he doesn't clap either! Guess you've got the new wine skin on that one, Tom! Perspective Tom, perspective.
    Well, as for this cradle Catholic.........not cold, not lukewarm. I'll take it hot thank you. Squelching is not for me.

    Thanks for the great Friday letter #58. As that old song goes, "I feel good......so good, (clap, clap), so good, (clap) I feel gooooooooood! See you at Mass.

    In love with Jesus, Maureen

    ReplyDelete

What do you think?