Hello again everyone. Gird your loins and shoo the children, we’re on to a hard subject today.
Snuff films
Back in the 1970’s, there were rumored to be films and videos for sale or rent which depicted actual executions, murders staged for entertainment purposes.
Supposedly, these films could be obtained at porno shops. Ostensibly, these films were illegal – depicting heinous crimes. They were ghastly precursors of those nauseating TV “reality” shows.
I have seen some awful stuff in print and on film, but thanks to the good Lord I have not seen a “snuff” movie.
However, I have now seen something even worse.
I have seen an abortion film.
Ordinarily I’m not queasy, but I couldn’t look at this one for long. Someone with a video camera had been permitted in the room while the “surgery” was taking place.
The carefully constructed urban legend is that an abortion is a simple, painless, quick and easy procedure. You can take it from me: It ain’t.
Some people need graphics in order to learn. If you’re one of those, and if you still believe any abortion is the right thing to do, I can supply the “links” for you and you can look for yourself.
You can watch while the “doctor” inserts the stainless steel tongs into the woman’s vagina. You can watch while the “surgeon” pulls out the placenta and then reaches again and again for the offending embryo.
The fetus thus removed has every human appearance. Arms, legs, hands, feet, fingers, toes, eyes, nose, mouth. Looks like a human baby to me.
I could provide even more graphic and detailed description of the procedure; suffice to say the fetus does not come out in one piece.
My experience with the abortion film is a little different than it would have been had I watched a “snuff” film.
We saw the abortion film on a website where one can also learn about the pro-life movement, or find legitimate statistics and information. Supposedly, this abortion film is reproduced for its shocking educational value.
Snuff films were (or are?) produced purely for cash flow and titillation.
I’m not seriously suggesting that anyone look up the site and view the abortion. We just happened across it. Stumbled over it. Wouldn’t do it again.
What I am seriously suggesting is that you re-evaluate your view on abortion – even if you already oppose abortion on moral grounds. The Invisible War is in actuality much worse than you ever imagined.
I am suggesting that you have been numbed by the media, you have been made callous by your immersion in “the world.”
Your expurgated and carefully scheduled television-born propagandized world view can’t possibly conceptualize the carnage that takes place, like we say, “24/7.”
You can’t see it. You don’t get it. You’re complacently floating downstream, with the current, with the wind. You are blinded.
-0-
Did you know that belief in and practice of eugenics did not die with Adolf Hitler? Did you know that Planned Parenthood has kicked butt on old Adolf?
Hitler’s entire murderous career effort looks puny by comparison. A drop in the bucket. Hitler couldn’t exterminate anywhere near the numbers of which Planned Parenthood and its companions in murder are capable -- daily.
Eugenics is defined as a “science,” and is said to be the method of improvement of human races and breeds through the control of hereditary factors. It’s the Black Angus theory of evolution/manipulation/control.
(If you want Angus cattle with long legs, you breed the bull and the cows with the longest legs. If you want short-legged Angus, you put the shorties and fatties in the straw together. Basic dairy-farmer no-brainer breeding technique. You don’t even have to go to CSU to know this.)
Eugenics and euthenics have the same root word, euthanasia, which in Greek means a painless or happy death.
As you know, there are some who advocate euthanasia, which in liberal relativist thinking is promoted as a kindly but permanent way to deal with suffering.
It’s not a huge moral leap from euthanasia, for the elderly and the suffering, to abortion – mass murder of the unborn.
The master race vs. eugenics
When the Japanese were defeated in World War Two, they didn’t just hang their heads and resign themselves to lives of meaningless slavery.
Instead, they said quietly to each other, “We gotta do this a different way.” Witness, then, the revolution since the war, the revolution in the way global business is done.
There wasn’t a “winner” after the war. There was a revolution, primarily instigated and powered by the Japanese. They gave up their violent pursuits and took their ambitions to the marketplace instead.
In the same wise, Adolf Hitler’s campaign to establish a “master race” through mass extermination of “inferior” persons didn’t fail. Hitler was only a rude pioneer in the field.
The eugenicists of the world looked at the bad public relations Hitler had brought to their cause and said quietly to each other, “We gotta do this a different way.”
From this thinking came Planned Parenthood and the powerful worldwide campaign to legalize, liberalize and normalize abortion. As with the Japanese, the more “sanitary” tactic has been an overwhelming success.
When Dwight David Eisenhower found himself on-site in Hitler’s death camps right after the war, he said “Take plenty of pictures.” Ike was correct: There are lots of flat-earth thinkers today who just don’t believe the holocaust happened.
Out of sight, out of mind. They need to see the pictures.
Until I actually “saw” the abortion video, I had no idea of the excessive violence of the violence. I had subconsciously bought into the lie that an abortion is a clean, quick, quiet, painless procedure.
Ike said, “Take plenty of pictures.”
Rare are the pictures of abortions. We don’t see it. It is the “invisible war,” taking thousands of lives daily.
If there were pictures of the bloody and broken little bodies piled up in dumpsters outside hospitals or Planned Parenthood clinics, or falling out of overloaded refuse trucks, perhaps more of us would “get it.”
But the imagery isn’t there. It’s cleverly hidden. It’s invisible. They don’t show it on TV. The war against the innocents continues virtually unhindered.
So how are you going to vote?
Word of the week:
Obsequious. Comes to us through French from the Latin, obsequi, to comply with.
One time in a Mexican restaurant, we were faced with a fawning waiter. So I turned to my friend Larry and asked, “How do you say obsequious in Spanish?” Heh heh. The English meaning is, an excessive willingness to serve or obey; overly submissive, fawning.
Next week’s word: Obstreperous.
-0-
Gripes? Complaints? Whines? or Comments? Adoration? Puppy love? Reciprocal rant? Feel free to express yourself in the comment section below this post.
I agree completely with the denial of the reality of abortion. We certainly 'see' all other kinds of sexual, violient reality on TV etc that seems to be acceptable by the media but the reality of abortion violence is not politically correct. A few of those 'reality' pictures would definately cause a stir and make more than a few people change their minds. Ironic how the pro-abortionists also claim to be the anti-violent, anti cruelty to animals, freedom of press, first amendment rights, 'peace' people who would rather save an animal than a human being and would be the first to "throw the stone" at a reality abortion movie. So much for their freedom of the press.
ReplyDelete